Table 8 Comparisons of correct diagnosis rates for deterministic faults in TEP between PC1DARMF algorithm and MSBA
From: Fault diagnosis of Tennessee Eastman process using signal geometry matching technique
Fault type | PC1DARMF algorithm | MSBA[17] |
|---|---|---|
IDV(1) | 60% | 88.76% |
IDV(2) | 65% | 92.54% |
IDV(3) | 60% | 12.41% |
IDV(4) | 15% | 49.56% |
IDV(5) | 75% | 69.44% |
IDV(6) | 100% | 83.39% |
IDV(7) | 95% | 75.33% |
Average | 67.14% | 67.35% |